Search This Blog

Saturday, December 26, 2015

'Tis the day after Christmas

'Tis the day after Christmas, and I've just got to admit,
I couldn't be happier that we're finally done with this shit.
No stockings were hung, no sugar plums danced,
no sleighs on my rooftop, not one reindeer pranced.

My wife went to sleep while I watched some porn,
and my kids were all sleeping off an overdose of popcorn
As the twilight deepened I wept at the cost;
another season past tense, another Christmas now lost.

When the stores shook the bell and we heard that ting-a-ling
Like lab rats we ran to buy up everything;
We pulled down the lever to get to the cheese;
but in the end all we were left with was overdraft fees.

If you wonder how Christmas became such a chore,
you can thank all the people who came here before.
They thought up the tree, and they thought up the bows;
they thought up the stockings, whilst calculating cash flows

It is such a filthy racket that I think it's obscene
if the stores would just admit, if they'd only come clean,
they make most of their money in one month of the year
if it wasn't for Christmas they wouldn't even be here!

We're programmed, you see, to dance to their song.
We're conditioned to march when they sing, come along.
We might as well be robots, these stores are so clever
when they play Christmas music we all pull the lever.

Well, I'm cutting it short, this is stupid you see,
as is putting glittery crap on a completely useless tree.
Say "Goodbye" to your money while the department stores cheer.
Say "Merry Christmas and have a happy new year,"
Say "seasons greetings" and "Happy Hanukkah"
and if you're spectacularly dense say "Merry Kwanzaa!"

But whatever you do don't you ever forget,
you've been programmed from birth to buy into this shit.

First you believed in Santa,
Then you found out he didn't exist,
Then you found out you were Santa!

Sunday, December 13, 2015

The Holy Grail of Stupid! Thanks Steve Chapman!

Which scenario is more plausible, thousands of scientists pretending to believe in global warming to get government grants or Cruz denying it to get campaign donations?
That quote comes from an editorial I found at "RealClearPolitics.com" Here's another gem:
You have to feel sorry for Ted Cruz. Donald Trump has hogged so much airtime with his cynical demagoguery that the senator from Texas has had a hard time capturing the attention of Republican voters. That is surprising, because when it comes to cynical demagoguery, this is the first time Cruz has ever lost out to anyone.

His patented formula is a mix of repellent ingredients: misrepresentation of facts, baseless smears, exaggerated sincerity and pretended solidarity with the average person. If Cruz tells you it's raining, you can leave your umbrella at home.
I'm going to go out on a really thick limb six inches from the ground and take a wild guess that "Steve Chapman"—the author of the above mentioned psychotic rant—doesn't like Ted Cruz very much.

We won't go into why. We know why ... Okay I bet some of you are demanding to know why "Steve Chapman" Hates Ted Cruz with the kind of Hatred that demands capitalization. Well, since I am a psychic and because I can actually see into "Steve Chapman's" puny little mind I'll just go ahead and divulge the plain truth. You see, Steve is a small "man" and he was abused by his mother ... sexually! ... I'm kidding. I'm just kidding relax ... I'm not really psychic.

But that's not why he hates Ted Cruz. He hates Ted Cruz because "Steve Chapman" desires another ice age, a really long one. That's right, ten thousand years of ice and snow that will eradicate evil mankind from the planet. He probably thinks rats or cockroaches will do a better job as future caretakers of Gaia, in, oh, about an epoch or two.

Let's talk about CO2. Did you know that the Earth is self-regulating? Did you know that plants use CO2 in photosynthesis? Did you know that in response to a greater level of CO2, plants grow bigger, taller, and faster? More plants, bigger plants, and taller plants mean a much greater amount of photosynthesis is occurring than before the increased CO2, meaning that all that extra CO2 is in the process of being converted to oxygen and food. But forget all of that "self-regulation" for now. How significant is CO2 as a greenhouse gas, and what can humans actually do about the temperature, even if they wanted to?

Just how much of the "Greenhouse Effect" is caused by human activity?

It is about 0.28%, if water vapor is taken into account-- about 5.53%, if not.

This point is so crucial to the debate over global warming that how water vapor is or isn't factored into an analysis of Earth's greenhouse gases makes the difference between describing a significant human contribution to the greenhouse effect, or a negligible one.

Water vapor constitutes Earth's most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect (5). Interestingly, many "facts and figures' regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold.

Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC's, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic).

Human activites contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small-- perhaps undetectable-- effect on global climate.
So let's ask Steve's question again, shall we? "Which scenario is more plausible, thousands of scientists pretending to believe in global warming to get government grants..." Hmmm ... "thousands of climate scientists" (with their thousands of families?) who depend on government grants not only to fund their science, but also to feed clothe and house all those families ... or Cruz denying it to get campaign donations? Are we asked by Steve Chapman to actually believe that Ted Cruz gets so much more money from these insane lunatic climate deniers than he does from say the KKK, or the Koch brothers, or why not Lex Luthor too, that just denying AGW is his Golden Ticket to the Oval Office?



Here's another question. How many climate scientists are completely unaware that it is in fact the water vapor in the atmosphere that causes 95% of the greenhouse effect? Do I hear silence? Helllloooo echo echo echo!!!! The answer is none. Not one. Well maybe Al Gore but he's not a climate scientist, he only pretends to play one on TV.

So why not a water tax? Or how about a stove tax. You there eating those boiled eggs! You there! Did you pay your steam tax?

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Have a Whopper Now and Another Later

BOGO Whopper If that link doesn't work, just Google "Free Whopper Coupon."

You say you only want one Whopper? You say that letting a Whopper, or any burger for that matter, sit in the refrigerator ruins it? Well normally you'd be right. The burger glues itself to the bun over time and when you try to peel it off to reheat you end up ruining the bun and have a layer of bread on your burger. The secret is of course removing the burger from the bun before it cools off and then putting that burger in a ziplock bag all by itself. Next you rewrap the bun and veggies in the original wrapper and place all of the above in your refrigerator.

Another trick that I think is very important, is to ask BK to skip the sauce; no ketchup, no mustard, and no mayonnaise. These sauces will make the bun soggy over time. I bet you already have these condiments in your refrigerator! If not put them on your next shopping list. A pack of individually wrapped American or pepper jack cheese, your favorite sauces, and of course a jar of jalapenos to make it great. Lunch and dinner for a little over four bucks.

You're welcome!

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Ending World Cockroach Hunger

Global Warming—aka Climate Change—is certainly a contentious subject. Two phrases come to mind: "The Debate Is Over," and "Hide The Decline." Two epithets come to mind: "Climate Deniers," and "Warmists." Two philosophies come to mind: "inequality is wrong," and "survival of the fittest."

The former—Democrats—want to be Robberhoods and take from those who have wealth and spread it around to those who don't, while the latter, believe that actions and results should bear their own attending rewards and punishments, as they deserve. Democrats think populism is great! They simply parrot whatever the majority are already saying. "The rich are too rich." "The middleclass is suffering." "The poor are too poor." "Inequality is the malady of the day, and we should do away with it." Meanwhile the latter believe that you get what you earn. You live the way you deserve through your own achievements.

Democrats—who want everybody to be absolutely equal—are the primary believers in climate change. Well, isn't that special!?

Climate Change—by the way—is the belief that the richest nations in the world are screwing over the poorest nations. The fact that this idea is so perfectly similar to the idea that the richest individuals in society are screwing over the poorest individuals is <sarc>a completely unrelated coincidence, I'm certain!</sarc>.

If only we could make everybody perfectly equal! Sadly—or perhaps happily—that is not possible. For eons, mankind has competed against each other. Those who succeeded lived and bore their children, while those who failed, did not. Today, that idea is old-fashioned. It's no longer about competing, having children and raising them, it's about being popular! How many facebook friends do you have? How many Twitter followers? Did you get your degree in woman / black / alternative lifestyle studies? Great! You'll need to come up with a couple hundred thousand dollars to pay that off but ... seriously so what? If you play your cards right I bet that it's entirely possible a future Democratic president will simply sign into law a bill that completely forgives all your student loan debt ... because the bank has and you do not. The store has and you do not. The professors have and you do not. The rich have and you do not.

VOTE FOR ME AND I'LL TAKE ALL THE BIG MACS FROM SELFISH MCDONALDS INVESTORS
AND GIVE YOU AND ALL YOUR NEIGHBORS A LIFETIME SUPPLY OF BIG MACS!


Because McDonalds will keep making Big Macs for the government to take. Because the rich will keep making money for the government to take. Because the rich countries will keep making money to send to the poor countries ... No! They wont! Furthermore, if you could somehow keep the productive working for the welfare of the unproductive, the only thing you'd be guaranteed of, is a massive population increase. You don't believe me? Fine ... Let's do a little thought experiment...

Imagine a family of rats...or cockroaches...or ticks. You go ahead and pick your useless parasite. Could be leaches, could be mosquitos, could be some kind of E. coli bacteria; it doesn't matter for our purposes. The important thing to remember is that whatever parasite you choose, it is defined by its complete uselessness. It produces nothing, it helps no one, it lives only for itself and to produce more of its kind. Now then, imagine a family of those parasites living in your home or your body or your clothing, wherever they'd normally infest. You look upon these parasites with tender concern. Are they doing well? Do they have plenty of food? A warm comfortable environment to live? Is there anything you—as a generous well-meaning host can provide them that will make their lives better? So lets say you picked a handful of cockroaches to look after. You feed your cockroaches. You provide water. When they have a new brood of little cockroaches you provide a warm safe environment and lots of TLC. You little Philoblattamist you! Your little family will need plenty of room to grow. If you run out of room in your own house, you'll need to provide additional homes. If you find that there aren't enough hours in the day to feed and worry over your millions of hungry cockroach mouths, then you'll need to hire some helpers. If you run out of money for all of the above you'll need to apply for a government grant.

As your cockroach population increases at an exponential rate, you'll need to consider ways to control that population. Perhaps you can convince the female cockroaches to terminate their pregnancies early. (I don't know if there's such a thing as a cockroach abortion but these are the sorts of things you'll have to look into.) In spite of all your care, your hope, your good wishes, you'll probably find that the teeming multitudes of cockroaches don't reciprocate in terms of either gratitude, or with keeping their cockroach neighborhoods clean and sanitary. You'll need to provide clean up crews, sanitation workers, health care workers, and DCS workers. (Department of Cockroach Services.) Keep in mind that your job will never get easier only harder. If you do it well however, the day will probably come when you will be the proud caretaker of a trillion cockroaches. Well Done!

Obviously the above example is silly. It was meant to be. It does however illustrate the point I'm trying to make. If people who don't work are given money, and if you give them even more money for each additional child they have, you are incentivizing unemployment, and you are also incentivizing bearing additional children. You will never get employment, what you will get is more children—lots more children, children who grow up to do what their parents did for a living...have lots of children.

But how does all this welfare discussion relate to global warming? Well, they're just similar examples of the same underlying misguided philosophy, the belief that the "state" can do a better job running our lives than we can. Obviously they are catastrophically mistaken.

The Global Warming movement is essentially a plan to transfer the wealth of wealthy industrial nations to primitive third world nations. The usual bills I've seen failing to pass in Congress involve allotting a certain number of "carbon credits" to businesses for the amount of carbon dioxide they are permitted to emit and then requiring them to purchase additional carbon credits in the global marketplace for excess CO2 emitted. It's important to remember that many countries with few or no factories, few automobiles, would be issued these carbon credits by population or perhaps land area and they could then sell these credits—unnecessary credits in their agrarian non-industrial country—in the global market. This is nothing less than global wealth redistribution. It's feeding the cockroaches on a global scale.

You think global warming's a problem now, wait till there's fifteen billion people crowding around the empty trough.

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

EBT and Football aka Pānis et Circēnsēs

The upcoming 2016 election determines America's fate. It seems all but a foregone conclusion that Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton has the Democratic nomination sewn up. As for the Republicans, it looks like Trump is the favorite. Everybody likes the Mexican purchased wall, and everybody likes the idea of deporting all the illegals in their many millions. Additionally, it also looks like the media is turning their attacks against Trump, now that he's finally being taken seriously. Here are a few recent articles, but there are thousands more. Well .... you know what? Who cares! Go get a couple of 40s and flip on the boob tube. I bet there's a football game on right now. And you know, that's WAAAAAY more important than who leads the country for the next four to eight years. Hey, don't believe me? Check out this profanity laced screed by a serious Eagles fan.

WARNING EXTREME PROFANITY BORDERING ON THE LUDICROUS!!!




Okay, okay, this guy goes on and on in an angry rant because his favorite team "The Eagles" lost to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. He seemed to be seriously upset, one might even say he's completely unhinged! But at the end of the day, what has he lost? Now it's possible that he lost a bet and has to pay somebody a lot of money. The thing is, in all that ranting and raving he never says that he lost any money, and I think we all know that his fury is not based on personal loss. Somehow his life is so wrapped around the fate of his favorite professional football team, that their loss is his catastrophe.



This guy is in tears because South Carolina lost. I'm not exaggerating when I say that, somewhere in America, there's a homeless guy raging—not because he's unemployed, or homeless, or all alone, not because he's probably going to freeze to death in the bleak winter weather forecast on the horizon—but simply because his football team lost a game. You really can't make this stuff up! A man has cancer, but his dying wish isn't to see his son graduate from Stanford University, no it's to meet Peyton Manning or Tony Romo, or maybe it's Tim Tebow! You see, if only his wish was granted he could die happily. If only he gets to shake so-and-so's hand and tell so-and-so to beat the living shit out of rival team X then his meaning in life will be fulfilled!

That's the circus in bread and circuses by the way. Fans completely subsume themselves in imagined glory, linking their own fate to that of their football gods. When their team does well their own miserable fate is immaterial. Who cares if they're homeless and starving, when their football team is going to the playoffs?

It is insanity in point of fact, and anybody who could step back and simply take an objective look at the phenomenon would quickly label it what is is ... an obsession.

Maybe you're a football fan, or a basketball, baseball, hockey, or soccer fan. You have your favorite team and that's it. You probably also have your hated team. You hate them because all your team's fans hate this one team. Maybe you like the San Francisco 49ers, and therefore you hate The Dallas Cowboys. Maybe you like the Georgia Bulldogs and therefore hate the Clemson Tigers. Every team has its traditional rival just like Luke Skywalker has Darth Vader. It's all so clichéd and predictable, that I for one, am blown aside—as my 49er loving, Cowboy hating brother would say. (Blown aside is almost—but not quite—as amazing as blown away.)

Sometimes I just want to scream WAKE UP!!!! The world is disintegrating around us, and so many of you seem to care about nothing but who just won or lost a meaningless football game. Okay, so your team won! That means you get a raise? No, you don't work for the Eagles. You don't get a raise. You don't get a bonus. You don't get squat, except for something called "bragging rights."

Okay BRAG! Tell me how awesome "your team" is, and and how sorry and pathetic "my team" is. Tomorrow when your daughter gets sick and you don't have medical insurance—because your company downsized you to part time and doesn't offer medical insurance to part timers—I hope the glow and the glory of your recent win, allows you to feel happy as you watch your daughter suffer.

No, I don't really wish that on you. I hope your daughter stays perfectly healthy so that you won't need the insurance which you lost because of Obamacare. Please, wish me the same luck, as I cope with exactly that same problem.
"Bread and circuses" (or bread and games; from Latin: panem et circenses) is metonymic for a superficial means of appeasement. In the case of politics, the phrase is used to describe the generation of public approval, not through exemplary or excellent public service or public policy, but through diversion; distraction; or the mere satisfaction of the immediate, shallow requirements of a populace, as an offered "palliative." Its originator, Juvenal, used the phrase to decry the selfishness of common people and their neglect of wider concerns. The phrase also implies the erosion or ignorance of civic duty amongst the concerns of the commoner.
It's hard to believe that we're reliving the same history all over again. Rome fell. The most powerful empire on Earth fell apart from within because of short-sighted policies and the pursuit of the trivial over the exigent. Here's the relevant Bible verse:
Ecclesiates 1:9

The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
Why don't we ever learn? It's all so absurdly comical. Watch your football game while America flushes itself down the toilet. Go to the store and get your "free" lunch with your EBT card. You've got nothing to worry about. Life is great! Drink your beer and forget about everything. I feel certain tomorrow's football game will solve all of your problems!

Sunday, November 15, 2015

Hey Black Lives... EFF YOU

Nobody cares.

We live our lives, we go to work. We have our good days and bad ones. Occasionally somebody offers a compliment, or an expression of gratitude, but mostly our efforts are met with silence. What a contrast! How often are our failures met with silence? Rarely. A waitress late with the food, a cook with slightly burned food, a cashier too slow scanning in coupons, all are immediately vilified. "Hello!" "Can I get some service?!" "I've been waiting for ten minutes!" "I don't have all day."

This Sunday I want to rest. I worked all week and just want to rest. But my cunting wife needs medicine. She needs her Zoloft. So here I am, working for the seventh day .... no .... the 325th day in a row without a single day off. Meanwhile my wife hasn't even made a sandwich in the same number of days.

Nobody cares.

I'm sitting here typing this with a heavy heart. I feel so hopeless. I don't believe this will ever end. No, I'm not talking about my seven days a week work schedule. I'm talking about our world. It's so depressing. So so so depressing. You want the litany? Okay, here's the short version... 19 trillion in debt, 127 trillion in unfunded liabilities, the worst most violent and bitter race relations since the Civil War. Eight billion people stomping about the world, Aquifers drying up, Global cooling, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria!

How bad is it? How absurd? How risible, How asinine, how insane!? There aren't words. Please, allow me to just mention this one fatuous absurdity...just as one example...Black Lives Matter protesters are upset in Missouri, because all the reporters that they've been so cozy with, are now apparently ignoring "Black Lives" completely and instead focusing on French lives. (By the way in case you were wondering, French lives are white lives and therefore they don't matter.) Today we can conclude conclusively and categorically that #OnlyBlackLivesMatter.

So here it is. I know a lot of you have been thinking this. They'll call me racist, but so what. I work seven days a week and pay taxes so that #BlackLives can get their EBT card. So, you know what? #FuckBlackLives!

Saturday, November 14, 2015

BOOM!!!!! .... No, not a suicide belt ... it's this comment...

Mary RN had this to say:
Practicing Islam should be a hate crime. The Koran should be treated like the confederate flag. It offends me. It should be outlawed and practicing this cult should be like going to a KKK meeting. If another terrorist attack happens on American soil, the mosques should be leveled. NO refugees from the middle east. None. The ones already here need to be kept in fema camps. Round them up.
YES! YES! YES! Islam is hate, and Mohammed is the Antichrist. Allah is Satan and all his followers are demons from hell. This is not hyperbole, this is demonstrable fact. Evil is as evil does. When will people wake up and smell the devil? Every Muslim is just a single synapse fire from going 9/11. Muslims are evil. They're savages. They're the enemy. Wait I've got an idea Obama, why don't you stand in the corner facing the wall and wait for the Blair Witch to take a nap?



Don't you abhor this kind of histrionic rhetoric? I bet you're thinking...what an idiot! What a racist. What a maroon! What an ignoranamous!



This whole thing is what I've been screaming since about 14 years ago. If the enemy confronts you, he must be defeated, utterly. He must be driven before you. He must be shown no mercy. His way of life must be destroyed. His livelihood must be annihilated, His contacts must be severed. His religion must be snuffed utterly and categorically. His every thought, gesture, and word, must be "UNCLE! UNCLE! UNCLE!"

Until we grind these savages into the dirt from whence they sprang, this shit will continue. But I predict that this latest French atrocity might just be a signed death warrant. At long last the people are finally waking up. They're beginning to realize that this cult of death called Islam must be decimated, outlawed, and finally excised from our planet.

Nuke Mecca!

LET'S FINISH THIS SHIT, ONCE AND FOR ALL!

France has its 9/11 moment

My wife of 15 years was diagnosed with adult onset diabetes several years ago. She was distraught, understandably so, but was even more distraught by the lack of sympathy from medical workers, and her doctor who frankly explained her condition was mostly her own fault. Her sedentary lifestyle and lack of weight control were the primary causes of her condition. She's since gone on an Atkins diet and has brought her weight down. She doesn't require insulin and as long as she controls her carbs tightly, she should be fine.

There are life-changing moments that all of us go through. We live for years doing whatever we want and suddenly out of the blue we discover that both action, as well as inaction, have consequences.

Many of you will be angry at my next comment. Tough shit!

If five or ten percent of the Bataclan concert goers had been carrying concealed, the outcome would have been triumphant instead of tragic.

These people were slaughtered like sheep. Like sheep! They played dead and now they are dead. It's tragic, horrific, unexpected, and very sad. If only a few of them had shot back. If only a few of them had rushed their attackers. If only they'd had a flight 93 moment, a Thalys train moment. But they didn't. And they all died, butchered like sheep in a slaughterhouse. It's shameful, in a word. Shameful!

Now, France is going to war. Hurrah...Turtling in their shell didn't work. Now they'll have to fight. I know...I'm the bad guy. I'm the one who doesn't kowtow to the PC police and express sympathy and empathy, and all those other pathys... My bad.

We had our 9/11. We watched in horror as thousands—not just hundreds mind you—were slaughtered like sheep. We watched in disgust as you French people refused to join us. Refused to fight. Refused to allow us to use your airports. Refused to even allow us to fly over your airspace. In response we refused to eat french fries. We created our own side item dubbed freedom fries. Childish I suppose, but also symbolic.

France, you thought you could remain neutral. You thought they'd leave you alone. You thought, if you made no waves, remained compliant, peaceful, neutral, conspicuously silent, they'd leave you alone. Obviously you were mistaken.

When my wife came home crying, I was supportive, but the words running through my head kept trying to slip through my lips. Don't you understand? Don't you get it? You really did bring this on yourself. This wasn't unexpected at all. There's no surprise here. Your own actions and in-actions made this moment inevitable.

Welcome to the fight, France. We understand that you didn't understand. We're glad you finally get it. Now, let's exterminate these savages down to the last inhuman POS, finally! Here, have some freedom fries. I made them this morning, and they are delicious! (sorry Taff, none for you.;=)

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

PETA is too vague

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is meaningless. I don't think these do-gooders have any idea what an Animal even is!
Insects. The insect class comprises the most diverse group of animals on the earth and constitutes more than half of all described animal species. Insect species also make up close to 90 percent (800,000 of 900,000) of all arthropod species.
The classification: Animal includes insects, and arachnids, and annelids. When you say Animal, you are talking about house flies. You are talking about ants, maggots, and worms.
Worms belong to a vast range of different phyla - annelids, nematodes, flatworms, acorn worms, velvet worms, spoon worms, goblet worms, jaw worms, horsehair worms, ribbon worms, horseshoe worms, thorny-headed worms, peanut worms, strange flatworms, and possibly even more.


Okay, so let's talk ethical. How does PETA feel about me taking an earthworm and threading it on a fishing hook to catch a fish? EVIL PERHAPS DEMONIC!?

Let's get real for a second. PETA doesn't concern itself with the lower animal phyla. It's mostly mammal, but also includes both reptiles and birds. If I'm a member of PETA, I assume that I only need concern myself with actual "People" treating animals ethically. What about putting vitamins in the water that leopards drink from? What if people interfering and making leopards healthier, caused gazelles to be killed in higher numbers? So ... Ethical Treatment could be construed as not helping a particular species to survive at the potential existence of another species? When you look at it this way, it's obvious that insecticides are strictly verboten. How could you disadvantage one phyla over another?

But it goes much further than that. Think about every cell in your body. Where did that cell come from? What animals were disadvantaged, were discriminated against, were annihilated, simply so that you—arrogant you—could be standing here today, holding up your PETA sign so proudly, while you march arrogantly up and down the square, etc., meanwhile countless insectoid species were sent to their graves on your selfish behalf! You should totally kill yourself.

If you're really a TRUE PETA BELIEVER, you don't belong. You represent an imbalance. You are only here because billions of animals lost their lives unethically, selfishly, over thousands of generations, just so that you could stand here asininely pontificating today. You don't belong PETA. If you had one iota of self-respect, if you really aren't the self-abrogating embodiment of hypocrisy that the world sees when they see you, you will climb into a carefully self-dug grave—preserving both insects and annelids—and then pull the dirt down on top of your selfishly existing self.

Saturday, October 31, 2015

Rebuttal to Why Liberals Identify with Criminals

I read and respect American Thinker. It's really a great resource for conservatives to gain new perspectives on current events from insightful conservative authors. With that said, occasionally I disagree wholeheartedly with a published article...case in point this one:

Why Liberals Identify with Criminals

Liberals hate cops, honest citizens with guns, and hard sentencing laws because liberals identify with criminals.
True
If a liberal dislikes the police because he thinks they are unfairly targeting his “harmless” drug use it’s not a big step for him to assume that cops are racist and violent towards other “innocent” people. After all if a liberal believes that cops are “racist pigs” then it becomes clear that arresting “innocent” drug users is an act of fascist repression and that drug users are actually victims of the “police state” not criminals.

This antipathy towards the law because of drugs is not new. During Prohibition Americans who liked to drink lost respect for the police. Anyone who likes to do things that are illegal is going to develop a distaste for the men and women in blue who enforce the law. It’s a natural consequence of the fact that human nature is such that we usually try and rationalize our behavior by scapegoating someone else.
True
Like other criminals, liberals often believe that what they do doesn’t hurt others. Robbers will rationalize that they’re stealing from people who are rich only because the system is corrupt and that they, the robbers, are just getting what should be theirs, and anyway the “rich” they’re stealing from won’t miss what was stolen. Rapists will claim that the woman “asked for it” and that “no means yes”. Similarly liberals argue that their drug use doesn’t hurt anyone. Apparently liberals either don’t care or are unaware of the victims of their drug use.
WHAT WHAT WHAT

So, Tom Trinko, (author of American Thinker article I'm rebutting,) smoking a joint is rape? Yes, that's what you said you ... you ... YOU FATUOUS JACKASS! What an incredibly asinine and amazingly risible fallacious argument you've left here like a steaming pile in the pasture. I refer you to Nizkor.com's Strawman Fallacy. Please read it in its entirety and once you understand it completely...please reread (pick through) your own steaming pile that you unwittingly—or perhaps wittingly?—deposited on American Thinker readers.

It's not just liberals that think the [War on Drugs] is a war against Americans. You would be hard pressed to find very many people who didn't think that Prohibition was misguided, a resounding failure, the prelude to organized crime, and perhaps the single most idiotic, backwards, and asinine experiment in left-thinking tyranny that was ever passed by the many united states. It was in short an unmitigated disaster. And the conclusion that any rational thinking human being should reach is that people like to get high. We enjoy euphoria. God built us this way.
Drug use however does have many victims; the gang wars in our cities, the massive deaths of blacks in our cities, the chaos and death in Mexico are all fueled by the dollars of American drug users. Mexico is turning into a cesspool of violence and corruption because Americans want their drugs and they don’t care who suffers.

The river of drug money also leads to the corruption of the police that in turn causes the very sort of police misconduct that liberals excoriate.
Tom, Tom, Tom, it's as though you are completely retarded. I know you're not, but how, how I wonder, can somebody who communicates as articulately as you do, profess to believe such a giant load of horseshit? Are you effing serious!? I'm honestly left awestruck at your fawning ignorance—or is it your unprincipled duplicity? In short, are you a liar or an idiot? You do know that the river of drug money flows from the mammoth spigot that is the drug war itself, don't you? If marijuana was legal, and if you could grow it in your backyard garden next to the peas and the cucumbers, who would be paying $50.00 for seven grams of it? Who would be smuggling tons of it into the USA? Who would be robbing stores, shooting rival gang members, beating up little old ladies, to get a little more of it?

As Clinton himself might say: IT'S THE DRUG WAR, STUPID!

Chris Matthews doesn't understand Engrish

Herro Mr. Matthews!

We noticed that you think Rand Paul doesn't understand the Constitution. Here, let me quote from your Fortune magazine article:

Rand Paul doesn't understand the Constitution

One of the main talking points Paul used to argue against the bill was that the suspension of the debt limit, as opposed to the raising of the limit to a new, specific dollar amount, grants the President a blank check to spend the people’s money on whatever he pleases:

But this is just not true. With a debt-limit suspension, the Treasury can only borrow money for spending that has already been authorized by Congress. While it’s true that the main drivers of federal spending–Social Security and Medicare–are entitlement programs whose costs rise automatically without annual Congressional approval, they are still programs that were approved by Congress. And Congress can, if it wants to, cut spending on these programs and obviate the need for the Treasury department to borrow more.
I'm not a Rand Paul supporter. I like Ted Cruz, for too many reasons to list in this blog post. That said, I like Rand Paul's defiance of the establishment status quo. For too long, we the people have watched helplessly as the debt and its corresponding "debt limit" have been run up and up and up. Here's somebody who's standing athwart the tracks on which a runaway debt train is barreling out of control. He's going to be crushed, but still you have to admire him for being the only one trying to do something. Unfortunately—as my metaphor suggests—he doesn't stand a chance.

My wife and I once had neighbors and close friends named Christie and Todd. Todd was a police officer, and Christie was a stay at home wife and mother of two children. They were great, and always had fun stories about their world. Todd could talk for hours about the crazy things he saw everyday, the idiots who always think they're too smart to get caught and the excuses they'd use. Christie would talk about her children, life, news she saw online, hobbies, and the oddities of people in public as well as the weirdos at a late-night Wal-Mart.

They had a problem. Their problem was debt. Todd was injured while apprehending a suspect. He hurt his back and had to take some time off. He got workers compensation of course, and that sustained him for a while, as he tried to get back into working shape. Meanwhile his wife went just a little bit crazy. I found out about this later from my wife. (Women can keep secrets so much better than men, don't you think?)

Anyway, Christie found out that she could take out a quick loan at these places that offered something called a "payday advance." You'd go in, submit your information, get approved simply by having a checking account, and then you'd write them a check for $120.00. They'd hand you $100.00 cash and tell you that they'd be cashing that check in exactly seven days. If you later discovered that you didn't have $120 in the bank by that seventh day, you could stop by the store and hand them a twenty. That would reset the clock for another week.

She did this at about eight or nine different check cashing places. She'd get another one just to pay off the other seven she already had going! Can you imagine it? It's a juggling routine where if a ball drops your whole family's way of life is totally screwed. It was foolishness pure and simple, and she should have known better. When she was finally called out on it, she was completely unrepentant. She snapped back..."What was I supposed to do? Let the house get foreclosed on? Let them repossess our car? Let the children go hungry? What exactly was I supposed to do? I did what I had to, and I'd do it again!"

It's a completely alien way of thinking. You can perhaps understand it on some intellectual level, but at the same time you can't understand how a rational human being who grew up with the same educational opportunities, the same customs and society, the same experiences at home on television, at school, at church, et cetera, can't simply grasp the fact that while climbing down into your local zoo's lion habitat to retrieve a dropped purse might seem sensible economically, it's still completely insane!

Chris Matthews, if you think 19, 20, 30 trillion dollars of debt is going to end well, you should totally go to the zoo, you should say "herro!" to the lion, Chris ... and I invite you — no! I urge you! — to climb on down and pet him on his big cute head.



p.s.

You might be wondering what my blog title has to do with the substance of my post ... I thought I'd pull a "Chris Matthews." (That's my own coined phrase that means: make an insane accusation, then disseminate it to millions of people, and then not bother to attempt proving it in the slightest.)

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Globull Warming Cat 6 Hurricane Annihilates Mexico!

Or Not...

This was the STRONGEST hurricane ever recorded! 245 MPH winds promised to overturn cars, trucks, and buildings, and leave nothing behind but swirling mud, and later when the waters receded, nothing left but dust in the wind. It was—in short—to be nothing less than POCKSECYLIPSE FULL OF PAIN!



I know how you feel. Everyday is harder than the next. For the first time in America's history the youth believe that their own lives will be harder than their parents. For the first time in America's history our children look at what we have and think to themselves that things will only get worse. And they're right. Not because of Globull Warming. Not because of racism. Not because of Homophobia. Not because of a "glass ceiling." Not because of Islamophobia. No! They know things will get worse because the American Dollar—the World's Reserve Currency, has been devalued systemically—and I would say treasonously—over the years until today a typical monthly power bill costs more than a new car used to cost. But whatever. That's my new mantra by the way: "Whatever." You raised taxes? "Whatever." You increased my health insurance premiums and lowered my benefits to the point where it no longer makes any economic sense to purchase health insurance? "Whatever."

The largest hurricane in the history of forever just hit Mexico? "Whatever."

I'm reminded of a stampede. What happens when the crowd allows fear, anger, happiness, or even curiosity to rule? Emotions and crowds are always a deadly combination. The demagogue uses both crowds and emotions to destroy those he hates. In history it's always been this way. From the French revolution to Nazi Germany to Barack Hussein Obama, the hater hates, and he uses crowds and emotions to enflame and destroy civilization.

There is an aphorism called Hanlon's Razor which states in essence: "Never attribute to malice, that which can be explained by stupidity." Yes, of course! They didn't mean to annihilate America completely both from within and from without, diabolically and completely. It was just a series of stupid mistakes that went on and on over the years ... perfectly.

Imagine—if you can—getting a zero on your Scholastic Aptitude Test. (the SAT) You'd have to successfully answer every single question incorrectly, starting with your own name. Is it possible? I'd say that it is, but I wouldn't attribute the zero score to anything like stupidity. It would take real brains to fail that completely.

So Thanks Obama! Thanks for Glubull Warming. Thanks for no health insurance. Thanks for a $300.00 per month power bill. Thanks for my 70 hour a week job. Thanks for everything you took, and thanks for the big fat zero you gave back. Thanks for less than nothing. A lot of people think you're a big fat zero, as in: Øbama, but I give you more credit than that. You took my bank balance and you multiplied it by -1. Thanks Obama, what could I do without you?

Saturday, October 10, 2015

The right of self-defense shall not be infringed

I got this topic today from my brother, Michael. Thanks bro.

Obama's been stumping recently for more gun control, or perhaps a better term than gun control is gun confiscation. Liberals believe that if there are less guns then logically there will be less violence, less crime, less murder, less suicide. In liberal parlance, less guns means more peace. Are they right? It turns out that, actually, you don't have to guess! That's right! There was a time not too long ago in geological terms when there were no guns. Nope! It was peace and tranquility. It was lions laying down with lambs. It was THE DARK AGES YOU MORONIC DUNCE!... okay okay calming down now. I was channeling my inner Sam Kinison. And maybe that's why liberals hate guns. What if you're crazy? Who wants a lunatic crooning lullabies to his arsenal?

Did our forefathers put the right of self-defense in the Constitution? Here's the 2nd amendment.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Liberals AKA Democrats AKA progressives AKA Barack Hussein Obama will argue that of all the people owning guns, very few indeed are part of any kind of "regulated Militia." They will also argue that in those times, "Arms" were black powder muskets, taking quite some time to load and shoot a single ball of lead. Nobody expected improvements in armaments. The musket was the most deadly thing on earth at the time. Our benighted founding fathers lacking any grounding at all in history were probably completely unaware that Arms got better and better as the years passed.

After all, for thousands of years people used rocks and sticks as "Arms", and for more hundreds of years they used bronze knives and later iron swords, and then even later for more hundreds of years it was armor and horses and lances and bows and cannons and trebuchet, and finally to top it all off it was finally muskets. Yes muskets. These modern day weapons represented the acme of technology. After pouring in the powder and ramming it down you put in your pellet of lead and touched it off with a match or something. Honestly, since the notion of "Arms" had never in the entire history of the world ever gotten more deadly, how, I ask you, HOW could our founding fathers have EVER expected anything perhaps even more deadly than a musket?

[By the way, the entire preceding paragraph was shrieked Sam-Kinison-style in an ever-louder ever shriller and ever more sarcastic tone. AH AHHH AHHHHHHHH!!!!]

We mustn't forget that part about a "well regulated Militia." Let's parse that phrase, shall we? If you read the statement logically, it says that because X is true, then Y is the law of the land. WHAT WHAT WHAT?! You say that X is false? It doesn't matter. You'll notice that the 2nd Amendment doesn't say While X continues to be true then Y is the law of the land. The founding fathers simply gave a reason for declaring that Y is the law of the land. They did not limit the right to bear arms, exactly the opposite was the case. They said ... "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!"

I would argue that since that constitution was ratified by the United States, the right to bear Arms has been infringed upon again and again and again. Recently Ben Carson has come under fire. He argued that if the seven million Jews in Nazi Germany had owned guns, history might have turned out differently. Alright Ben, I just going to come out and say it... THAT'S THE FACT, JACK!



And so now, we get down to brass tacks. Is it okay for you to defend yourself from an aggressor? Let's take a look at bullfighting for the answer. The bull is probably going to lose, but just to be sure, do they cut off its horns? That's stupid! If somebody attacks you, you have the right to defend yourself.

You want to know what it was like before a man could load a pistol and confront his attacker on equal terms? Your forefather was most likely a peasant. He lived a life of starvation and hardship. Ninety percent of his crop was confiscated at sword point for his entire life. He faced an armored man wielding a sword and shield. Every knobby bone in his body stood out as he shivered in the cold. He didn't stand a chance.

If that sounds like world peace to you ... then you're too stupid to continue living, so do us all a favor, and shuffle off, already.

Sunday, October 4, 2015

Can't Touch This.

KABUL — The acting governor of Afghanistan's northern Kunduz province said Sunday that Taliban fighters had been routinely firing "small and heavy" weapons from the ground of a local hospital before it was apparently hit by a U.S. airstrike over the weekend. (snip...)
Schools, hospitals, and mosques, are considered "safe ground" by the enemy. They set up mortars and rocket launchers on "safe ground" so that when—inevitably—they are hit by counter-fire, they can immediately run to the main-stream media and scream in hysterical anguish and woe that the Great Satan has again crossed that fantastically ephemeral line between socially acceptably war, and the darkly evil genocide that all Muslims know is being perpetrated against all Muslims everywhere.

When you think of America, those four diabolical syllables should—if you've been properly programmed by your neighborhood leftwing public school—conjure thoughts of barbarity, carnage, fangs dripping blood, the routine flogging of slaves carrying burdens too heavy for any man to carry, soldiers firing their M-16s into screaming crowds of fleeing school children, rape, pillage, and horror unimaginable.
In an interview, Hamdullah Danishi said the Doctors Without Borders compound was “a Taliban base” that was being used to plot and carry out attacks across the provincial capital, Kunduz city.

“The hospital campus was 100 percent used by the Taliban,” Danishi said. “The hospital has a vast garden, and the Taliban were there. We tolerated their firing for some time” before responding.
<snark>Gosh! It seems to me that Doctors Without Borders is a really SUPER idea!</snark> They're doctors who don't care about politics; they just want to save lives. Yet...they continued doing their work knowing ... KNOWING!!! ... that rockets were being launched from their hospital "safe ground" and that these rockets were most likely killing people. Tens of people, hundreds of people, who knows how many people? What if rockets were being launched from the roof of the grounds where you worked? If your job was saving lives then I have a simple question Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), would you save more lives by running your hospital / "safe ground" or just packing up and going home? I ask this question most sincerely because it's a question you well-meaning—yet misguided—assholes have apparently never asked of yourselves.

Friday, September 25, 2015

I'm taking Redstate out of my blog roll.

In fairness, Trump is not the only GOP candidate to have facilitated this deliberate and malicious replacement of Americans with foreign workers who are more easily underpaid, threatened and dominated. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) favors tripling the number of H1B-Visa applicants to replace scientific and technical workers such as IT Technicians at US companies. It was a senatorial aide to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) who most openly explained what these visa programs really existed to accomplish. There are no legitimate protectors of the American republic on the issue of immigration.
There won't be any GOPe failtheater here.
The site is a subsidiary of Salem Communications. Erick Erickson is the Chairman of the Board and Editor-in-Chief of RedState.[2] At the time of the purchase, Eagle Publishing agreed to let RedState maintain its editorial constructs as a collaborative blog. The site's editor-in-chief, Erick Erickson, was a political contributor on CNN from 2010 to 2013; he joined Fox News as a political contributor in 2013.[4]

Thursday, September 24, 2015

[They] are turning the world into homos! Here's why.

As I was walking through the grocery store today I turned down the Deodorant/shampoo aisle. I turned to my brother and pointed out the cheapest shampoo. (Suave) A 32 ounce bottle costs $1.59. I said, "You see that bottle of shampoo? You can wash your hair with that, but you can also use it as body soap. There was a day when they didn't have "Shampoo," they just had soap. Then what happened, is that some genius figured out that if you make a soap specifically for hair, you can sell twice as much soap." My brother was doubtful. "How do you know that's what happened?" "Because I know people. I know scams, and I know how scammers work."

Suddenly I realized I was onto something. I looked towards the other side of the aisle and what do you know, there it was! On one side was men's deodorant and shampoo, and on the other side of the aisle was women's deodorant and shampoo. So I said to my brother: "Look over here. You see this? There was a day when they didn't have one kind of soap for men and a different soap for women. It was just soap. They figured out how to sell four different kinds of soap for hair and body and men and women, two different kinds of deodorant, also."

"You know what?" I said, "something just occurred to me. The makeup industry that convinced women that they should slather their faces with all that plaster and paint is certainly quite the racket. One paint for the eyelid, one paint for the lips, one paint for the eyelashes, another for the cheeks, a pencil for the edge of the eyelid. More paint for the fingernails and probably a different paint for the toes."



"Do you see the problem?" I asked. "It's a waste of money?" I shook my head sadly at his lack of imagination. "Look, the cosmetics industry is a HUGE. But they're only getting half the market. What if they could get men to wear makeup? Then they could sell twice as much!" So there it is. You want to know why the big push to turn everybody gay? So they can sell more makeup.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

What's Happening?

It's just never enough, is it? It is tragically Sisyphean in point of fact. The never-resolved tragic situation seems to be America's calling card. We go just so far, but never quite far enough to finish. World War II was the last time that we actually finished something that we started. Vietnam, Korea, the never-ending wars in the Mideast represent a roiling stew of humanity that can't ever quite make up its mind about what it is that we want. The war on poverty. The war on drugs. The war on wars. What a joke! It's all so impossibly stupid and pointless that as I write these words I'm left shivering with fury.

The road to Obamacare required a super-majority in the Senate, and a President who'd sign on the dotted line. It's a fascinating story of bad-luck and fate, that you might be interested in discovering. Today many of us have lost our health insurance. Many more of us have discovered that in-spite of doubled insurance premiums, our coverage has almost vanished.

Planned Parenthood. What a joke! Why not just call it what it is? They should rename this diabolical unholy flock of baby slaughterers. Why not call it: "Oh Shit!" As they carve up your "donation" and sell it piece by piece for a tidy profit, you might want to ask yourself what does it cost?

I had an argument last night with my atheist brother. He couldn't stop arguing the bible with me. I'd say something like: "How did the Big-Bang happen?" and he'd respond with a non-sequitur about a "magic man in the sky." "Where did the first one-celled organism come from?" "Well it certainly didn't come because the magic man in the sky said 'abracadabra'." "Just explain where the first one-celled organism came from!" "I don't have to. Everything you say is stupid. You're stupid. It's too bad you believe in ghosts vampires, werewolves and magic men who live in never-never land."

"You don't have to?!!! WTF! You don't have to have an explanation for how life happened? You claim to have all he answers and you claim that science itself is on your side but you refuse! You REFUSE! to even entertain the idea that your own hypothesis of life omits ... leaves out ... doesn't mention ... ignores ... fails to recognize that life is so impossibly complex that it CANNOT! happen by accident.

All atheists have on this topic is the 'BELIEF' that life just suddenly and mysteriously appeared as though by some strange and mysterious sort of alchemy or something. BOOM! LIFE! Hurrah!? That's not an argument that's insanity! You haven't gone far enough. You've stopped at 'I don't have to know how it happened.' What happened to: 'then what?'"



Oh but I've gone off topic. Appy polly loggies. The world is on the verge of eating its own tongue—perhaps with a serving of fava beans and a nice chianti—but lets ignore all of that and unilaterally decree that GAY MARRIAGE IS THE LAW OF THE LAND! Iran with nuclear missiles is the law of the land. Common core and failure is the law of the land. NASA is about making Muslims feel good about their own dischievements.
Charles Bolden, a retired United States Marines Corps major-general and former astronaut, said in an interview with al-Jazeera that Nasa was not only a space exploration agency but also an "Earth improvement agency".

Mr Bolden said: "When I became the Nasa administrator, he [Mr Obama] charged me with three things.

"One, he wanted me to help reinspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math, and engineering."
If you fell asleep 40 years ago and woke up this morning, I would expect you to ask this question:



Friday, September 18, 2015

Donald Trump Agrees Obama is Muslim and Foreign Born

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you. How outrageous! When Trump was confronted with an ethical dilemma of Grimace Proportions, he actually agreed with the villain! It was as if a man had just bitch-slapped a woman and everybody who witnessed this obamanation instead of being disgusted and outraged, was instead thrilled about it!


WARNING NON-STOP PROFANITY, VIOLENCE AND INFINITELY EXTREME STUPIDITY!!!


While this was mildy entertaining—in a vaguely misogynistic way—it serves to illustrate a point. We simply do not expect large men to just suddenly bitch-slap a smaller woman, even if the woman clearly deserves it. I know what you're thinking. No woman deserves this. It's not right! A man should just take one in the ball-sack and shrug it off, am I right? Okay, but that's not the point I'm making here. The point is that when a Trump fan asked a question of Trump by prefacing the question with a disquisition regarding Obama and his Muslim faith, his foreign birth, and his fake birth certificate, Trump simply ignored it, perhaps even agreed with it. That's right, he didn't immediately verbally bitch-slap the impudent and manifestly politically incorrect supporter, instead he said "right."



Can you believe the nerve of Trump? After the deranged unhinged rant which despicably questioned the authenticity of our dear leader, Trump not only didn't correct the man, but instead actually seemed to agree with him, by saying: "right." Now then, you can ask Snopes.com about it and they'll tell you the idea that Obama's birth certificate is a forgery is simply an urban myth. Here's the findings of a six-month long investigation by a group of professional investigators in Arizona who can spot a forgery from a mile away:



Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Ahmed Mohamed and his ominous clock



The New York Times wants you to be as outraged as they are at the treatment that this young teen received from school authorities and police in Irving Texas. How shameful and unjust—some would say—to arrest a young teen for simply engaging in the American dream, engaging in the learning process and innocently building a digital clock. In a metal box. With metal wire wrapped around it. And—by the way—how bigoted and racist for any of us to even consider the fact that his name happens to be Ahmed Mohamed.

Taqiyya is a time honored Muslim tradition. In contrast to the tenets of Christianity, deceit, dissembling, and bald-face lying are all tacitly accepted and even encouraged when it promotes the advancement of Sharia or the increase of Mohammed followers.

So, who're you going to believe? Ahmed Mohamed or your lying eyes? It looks like a bomb and his name is Ahmed Mohamad. What a perfect foil Ahmed presents to us. He's just a wrongly accused innocent kid. He's not a terrorist, and shame on you for thinking he might me. Now we've learned the error of our ways. Now we can let our bigotry and racist stereotyping finally fall by the wayside, and embrace the 10,000 Syrians that are on their way. But don't worry, only 200 of them are likely to be terrorists.

It's at this point that I thought it would interest you to know that the catastrophic terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, was the result of only 19 terrorists. If 19 jihadis could cost us two trillion dollars, doing some simple math—okay this math wasn't quite so simple after all—I get over one-hundred five billion per terrorist. That works out to 105,263,157,894.00 x 200 = twenty-one trillion dollars of possible damage these poor refugees could potentially inflict upon America under cover of taqiyya and our politically correct thought police...AKA NYT.

Did I mention the precocious fourteen-year-old Muslim named Ahmed Mohamed who already knows how to build digital clocks from scratch?


UPDATE 09/17/2015 12:55 PM CST

Ahmed's device does look suspicious. I didn't have a picture of it yesterday, but here it is:

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Are you a person or are you a member of the herd?

Imagine someone completely useless. I bet you don't have to imagine; I bet you know somebody who is completely useless. Feed her. Clothe her. Listen to her complaints. She doesn't get enough, she complains constantly. She's hungry. She's cold. She's hot. She's thirsty. She's hungry. She's in pain. Life hasn't treated her kindly. She's a victim of circumstance. If only she'd been luckier, born in a wealthier family, taller, stronger, smarter, etc.

If you ask her what the meaning of life is, she'd probably tell you that there is no meaning. Life is a puppy struggling to get a suck at the last tit. Life is a tree that wasn't burned in the latest wildfire. Life if a fox who gets a drink of water without getting caught in the hunter's trap. Life is a dream, a scam, a joke, a sentence, a mummer's farce.

Think about all the people who depend on you. You go to work everyday. You do what society expects. You pay your taxes, do your shopping, vote. I bet you've sometimes asked yourself, "Who am I?" "Why am I here?"

Why do you work so hard and for such long hours to support people who are completely useless? Please notice that I'm not talking about children who've yet to grow up. I'm not talking about somebody who's sick and trying his best to get better. I'm not talking about the deaf dumb blind kid who sure plays a mean pinball. I'm talking about the person—I use that them loosely—who refuses to do anything for anybody. A world of sociopaths exist and for them the only question they would ask is "what do I get out of this deal?" Their only imperative is getting the utmost for nothing at all.

They have cow brains. They graze on what life offers, offering nothing and existing only to consume what the earth gives them free of charge. They are prey. They exist to be run down and consumed. Nature will eventually sentence them to their deserved fate. They have a (D) beside their name.

Friday, September 11, 2015

Omens of darkness ahead

Thunder crackles as I write these words.

I saw a rainbow this morning. I didn't think to myself when I saw it, that it had something to do with fornication, unnatural sexual acts and people who wanted their penises chopped off. No, I immediately praised God. It didn't occur to me in the moment of that beautiful sight that rainbows had anything to do with a bunch of deviants and perverts. Seeing the rainbow glowing so perfectly in the darkening sky I thanked God out loud for his bounty and for this beautiful world that he has created for all of us.

As I drove along further, the skies continued to darken and the rainbow disappeared. Then, ahead, I saw a glowing cloud in the darkening sky, an impossibly perfect cloud glowing so brightly that it was the only thing different in the this night black morning. It was shaped exactly like Africa, complete with Madagascar to its right. What could it mean?

Iran and the capitulation deal that, frankly was pre-agreed upon by both Democrats and Republicans was inevitably passed by not passing, this was an impossibly labyrinthine contortion of congress which in any sane world would make all the ground hogs sit up and ask: WTF just happened? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? etc.

Sanity alas is behind us and chaos and woe is the forecast.

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Cynicism City and Legal Kung-fu

My brother lost his job and his insurance. He's in the process of looking for another job but insurance is the problem at this point. His wife who's divorcing him doesn't have him on her insurance and since they're still married he can't get medicaid. He's also homeless since she kicked him out, has no vehicle—(his ex-boss provided him with a company car so why buy his own?)—oh yeah and his kidney's are at 20% function and they develop kidney stones faster than you can say "spit." (he just got another one.)

He's living with my family now, but I can't get him on my insurance. He's not a spouse or a dependent. Now, this all leads up to the magic cynical question of the day...why can't I get married to my own brother—while of course keeping my wife? If that happened, he'd be a spouse and I could get him insurance, allowing him to get a prescription for blood-pressure medication, medication to keep him from developing more kidney stones, oh yeah and also medication to keep him from screaming out loud as the kidney stones he has now swirl around stabbing and scratching at the insides of his kidney?

Okay, time for truth. I canceled my insurance. My boss asked me to pay $187/week for a policy that had a $5000.00 deductible per family member and no copays. AKA Prescriptions $5000.00 deductible. Doctor visits $5000.00 deductible...etc. This was at best what they used to call bare-bones catastrophic coverage ... as in ... So you got hit by a meteor, now what?

However, what if I could get my brother on my insurance? He'd most definitely cost WAY MORE than $5000.00 in only a couple of months and all of a sudden it would be worth paying my extravagantly overpriced and completely worthless insurance premium. Shitty insurance would suddenly and amazingly be worth 187/week! Now I realize some of you are saying...why do you want to bilk the insurance industry and the healthcare industry for thousands of dollars that they will lose if they have to pay for your brother's hospitalizations and prescriptions? Isn't "bilk" a great word? Thank you in advance for your rhetorical objection. Please, allow me to retort...



The inflation rate in health care has been more than double the general inflation rate. In addition Obamacare has exacerbated the problem to a catastrophic degree...this, this, and this.

Meanwhile I haven't had a raise since George W. Bush was president. Let that sink in, for just a minute. I'm not alone. I'm a regular guy who works 70+ hours a week just to make ends meet. You'll notice that out of a million blog-o-sphere blogs there's no ... please give me money ... button. I'm a cynic, yes, but I'm a proud one. So I guess I'll let the drama in Kentucky play out. I'll wait and see whether sister wives is a-okay with Justice Kennedy.

UPDATE...

I almost forgot...

THANKS OBAMA!

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

This alternatively fueled vehicle is not just feasible, it's really fast!

An electric supercar powered by a graphene-based hydrogen fuel cell with better performance than a Ferrari is being developed by a newly established consortium. The car, to be named Edison Electron One, will be the first project of the newly established Edison Motor Cars – a partnership between Sunvault Energy, the Edison Power Company and Delaware Corporation.

The firms said Edison Electron One, to be unveiled in 2016, will be equipped with an electric drive unit at each wheel, providing the vehicle with 1,355 Newton meters of torque, which is almost double that of a Ferrari 488 GTB and one third more than that of the Tesla P85D.

More


The link has a picture of a Tesla P85D, not the yet to be built Edison Electron One, which I assume must be far along in its planning and design stages if they're really unveiling it in 2016. If graphene isn't in your vocabulary yet, WAKE UP!

Artist rendering of an ever-less far-fetched space elevator.

Sunday, August 30, 2015

Liberal Authoritarianism AKA sanctimonious hypocrisy

You've often heard the question ... if he or she was the enemy a terrorist or a KGB plant ... what would he/she be doing differently? As in, if Obama was deliberately seeking to destroy from within the United States of America—bankruptcy, military defenselessness, gangs, racial violence, anarchy (AKA black-lives-matter)—instead of being its president, what would he doing differently? The answer is of course nothing. If the answer is nothing then it doesn't matter what his intentions are. He is the enemy.

Suppose your father goes berserk, loses his job, doesn't pay the bills, maxes every credit card, pawns the title to his car, goes on a payday loan spending spree. Now your family is bankrupt. The apartment manager evicts you. You're homeless and destitute. You could say ... "well, we had some bad luck." You could say ... "well, we're the victims of capitalism and greedy rich people." You could say, "well, the government should have protected us." You could say, "well, if it hadn't been for those meddling kids..." The truth is your father was the enemy. By action or inaction he caused the chain of events that destroyed your way of life. As you beg for spare change and wait in line for your bowl of free soup, never forget who's to blame. Intention or desire doesn't matter at this point. If your army buddy shoots you because he's got PTSD, it doesn't matter to you or those who love you that it was all just a tragic mistake. If someone harms you—even accidently—the injury hurts, and continues to hurt.

To most people, intentions matter. If you deliberately injure or kill a person, this is vastly different than if the whole thing was just a big mistake. "Oh was the gun loaded? ... My bad." "So if I press this button—like this—we launch five-hundred nuclear missiles? Wait...did I just..." I hope that by now you're beginning to understand that intentions—or as I like to say alleged intentions—are irrelevant. Intentions are irrelevant. If you are the enemy willing or not, then you are the enemy, and we should have no compunction whatsoever in putting you down ... forever.

Right now, at this moment, there's a movement to destroy all of us. They may not know they're attempting to destroy us from within, but regardless of their intentions, that is exactly what they're working towards. Are you going to let that happen? Of course not. You're going to fight back, right?

Liberals are taking your children away from you! They're taking your language away from you! They're dismantling our military. Teaching your children that homosexuality is wonderful ... and hey, why not have your penis and testicles chopped off?

Liberal authoritarians are the problem. Let's drive the coal industry into bankruptcy! Let's demand car manufacturers meet impossible MPG standards.

I'll bring up my own pet peeve. Authoritarian drivers. Did you ever get stuck behind some guy that thinks the speed-limit is too high? In his own petty way he's Obama junior. You'll conform to his own below the law speed limit because frankly he's in front and there's only the one lane. He could go faster. He could pull off and allow a mile of cars waiting behind him to go ahead, but that's not the kind of person were dealing with. We're not dealing with a reasonable person who just wants everyone to be happy. Frankly, we're dealing with an asshole who enjoys the misery and/or fury of others. What are their intentions? They would claim they're just looking out for everyone else. They would claim that they know best. They would claim that all of us are going too fast and even though it seems to be an inconvenience, in the end, all of us will be better off. Who cares what this guy says. We know by the grin on his face that's he's having a great time leading the slow highway parade. The slow driver is not an aberration. In fact his kind dominate the establishment of both parties, but especially the Democratic party. He is the quintessential epitome of the hypocritical sanctimony that these liberal assholes—who enjoy watching the world suffer under their own authoritarian domination—represent.

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Coining a new term—and admitting to being one—"Stayers"

Hillary and her server are the talk of the nation. Obama, far from protecting her, is probably actively urging his people to go after this. I don't think Obama wants Clinton to be president. Actually I don't think Barack Hussein wants anybody but himself to be president. There's birthers and there's truthers, and to that I'll add the term "stayers." When Hillary Clinton implodes ... and the constant drumbeat in the mainstream media signals that this was always intended, who will be left to run? Well, there's always Michelle Obama. She could run and if Donald Trump ran as a 3rd party candidate, as I suspect he will, then Michelle Obama is virtually assured her golden crown.
The "extremely serious" investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while she served as secretary of state is being led by an FBI "A-team," an intelligence source told Fox News.

The source said the investigation is "extremely serious" and is centered around 18 US Code 793, a section of the Espionage Act related to gathering and transmitting national-defense information.

Two emails reportedly found on Clinton's server from 2009 and 2011 contained information regarded as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," one of the highest levels of classification.

The two emails were drawn out of a batch of 40 randomly selected from about 30,000 "work-related" emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state, from 2009 to 2013.

Some of the information — such as communications intercepted via satellite or drone — is protected under the law 18USC798, which means they have tighter rules and higher penalties. Massimo Calabresi of Time recently noted that the law "makes it a crime not just to knowingly mishandle such secrets, but also to use them 'in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States.'"

As a result, the FBI's investigation has gone "way beyond what the intelligence community's Inspector General ever would do," a senior intelligence official familiar with the case told Time.

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Is birthright citizenship merely a game of kick the can?

Megan Kelly grills Ted Cruz on birthright citizenship:



Did you ever play kick the can? The game works like this ... whoever is "it" closes his eyes and counts to a predetermined number. Meanwhile everybody hides. After Mr. "It" reaches the predetermined number he's going to hunt down all the people playing the game. There's a can on the ground that represents safety for those who aren't "it." If they can avoid "Mr. It" and successfully kick the can they are safe. They win. They won't end up being "Mr. It."

How sad is it that a vagina with a baby behind it is the modern day equivalent of a tin can? All an illegal immigrant needs to do is evade "Mr. It" long enough to 'kick the can' and they're safe ... forever! Megyn Kelly "a real womyn, by the way" wants to know would Ted Cruz deport American citizens. Yes it is a mainstream media question. Yes it is the first thing Chris Matthews would ask. Yes it is completely unequivocally and completely irrelevant, and yes it's an unfair question. So why would Megyn Kelly ask it? Is she secretly a female Chris Matthews, or is she merely preparing the candidates for what they'll face as they go forward? Maybe she thinks of herself as a sparring partner. She's not trying to knock anybody out, merely teaching them to keep their guard up. Okay, perhaps. But now it's time to look at the question. It doesn't look like anybody has. Point number one: Is birthright citizenship valid? Point number two: If birthright citizenship is valid, what do we do with the parents?

Unfortunately with the recent Supreme Court, if the decision went to them, "Kick the Can" would be the decision. This despite—for instance—the indisputable fact that children of foreign ambassadors have never been considered as Americans—they're not considered "SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF," the clause that every single mainstream media journalist, reporter, or pundit has forgotten, ignored, or never bothered to read.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
"SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" So a can is kicked, a baby is born. Now they can apply for welfare and an EBT card? Let's not discuss or even entertain the possibility that birthright citizenship was never what the creators of the 14th amendment ever desired...okay obviously we are forced to discuss exactly that!
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads in part:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside." Babies born to illegal alien mothers within U.S. borders are called anchor babies because under the 1965 immigration Act, they act as an anchor that pulls the illegal alien mother and eventually a host of other relatives into permanent U.S. residency. (Jackpot babies is another term).

Post-Civil War reforms focused on injustices to African Americans. The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans, whose rights were being denied as recently-freed slaves. It was written in a manner so as to prevent state governments from ever denying citizenship to blacks born in the United States. But in 1868, the United States had no formal immigration policy, and the authors therefore saw no need to address immigration explicitly in the amendment.

In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by writing:

Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country." The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.

The correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment is that an illegal alien mother is subject to the jurisdiction of her native country, as is her baby.

Over a century ago, the Supreme Court correctly confirmed this restricted interpretation of citizenship in the so-called 'Slaughter-House cases' [83 US 36 (1873)] and in [112 US 94 (1884)]. In Elk v.Wilkins, the phrase 'subject to its jurisdiction' excluded from its operation 'children of ministers, consuls, and citizens of foreign states born within the United States.' In Elk, the American Indian claimant was considered not an American citizen because the law required him to be 'not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.'

Congress subsequently passed a special act to grant full citizenship to American Indians, who were not citizens even through they were born within the borders of the United States. The Citizens Act of 1924, codified in 8USCSß1401, provides that:

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe.
The original intent of the 14th Amendment was clearly not to facilitate illegal aliens defying U.S. law and obtaining citizenship for their offspring, nor obtaining benefits at taxpayer expense. Current estimates indicate there may be over 300,000 anchor babies born each year in the U.S., thus causing illegal alien mothers to add more to the U.S. population each year than immigration from all sources in an average year before 1965.

Australia rescinded birthright citizenship in 2007, as did New Zealand in 2006, Ireland in 2005, France in 1993, and the United Kingdom in 1983. This leaves the United States and Canada as the only remaining industrialized nations to grant automatic citizenship to every person born within the borders of the country, irrespective of their parents' nationality or immigration status.

American citizens must be wary of elected politicians voting to illegally extend our generous social benefits to illegal aliens and other criminals.
I realize that the vast majority of the American electorate mistakenly believe in "birthright citizenship. If they merely contained theirselves with the belief that Santa Clause and the Tooth Fairy are watching our every move, the world would be a vastly better place to live. Alas, sadly that is not the case. Nevertheless, even if you believe in the Tooth-Fairy, Santa-Clause, and birthright citizenship, there still remains a commonsense answer to Megyn Kelly's question. If a baby born on this side of the border is automatically granted citizenship—AKA it kicked the can—then it is an American citizen. What if the police find an abandoned baby in a basket by the side of the road ... what do they do? It's common sense it's also called an orphanage. Alternatively it's called foster-care and it's also called adoption. If the illegal immigrant parents want to, they can certainly give their new child up for adoption, otherwise they can take themselves and their can-kicking infant back to wherever they came from. Please keep in mind that the can-kicking infant has an American birth-certificate. This would certainly be grounds later to prove United States citizenship whenever he/she desires to return—sans non-citizen parents of course. How Many People are Seeking to Adopt?
According to the data from the National Surveys of Family Growth from 1973, 1982, 1988, and 1995, that there were 9.9 million women who had ever considered adoption, 16% had taken steps towards adoption, and 31% of these had actually adopted a child. (National Center for Health Statistics, 1999)

The 1995 National Survey of Family Growth found that 500,000 women were currently seeking to adopt a child. (Freundlich, 1998)
Of the 500,000 women seeking to adopt, only 100,000 had actually applied to adopt a child. (National Center for Health Statistics, 1997)
The 1995 National Survey of Family Growth found that 232,000 women were currently taken concrete steps towards adoptions, compared to 204,000 in 1988. (National Center for Health Statistics, 1999)
According to the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth there are an estimated 3.3 adoption seekers for every actual adoption.
According to the 1988 National Survey on Family Growth, about 2 million women ages 15 to 44 (3.5%) had ever sought to adopt a child.
Of these, 1.3 million did not adopt and are no longer seeking.
620,000 have adopted one or more children.
204,000 are currently seeking to adopt.
(Bachrach, London, Maza, 1991)

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Every eight years!

If you look at this historical Dow Jones Industrial Average chart going back to the 1980s, some frightening patterns stand out. Every eight years there's a big shakeup and the value of these stocks is cut in half. We're now in the eighth year once again. My prediction is the DJIA drops by half in the next couple of years and reaches its bottom at about 9250. It's also interesting that it coincides with the election cycle of a new president each time. Notice the tranquil easy pace from 1970 to 1995? That's 25 years of nothing much happening. Then all of a sudden in '95 the DJIA takes off. That's also when all of a sudden average joe could invest in the stock market all by himself using a computer. Without the requirement of sending every trade through a broker, the world jumped into the stock market. And it soared! But with all the people buying and selling came a never before seen degree of volatility. People fear change. They fear uncertain tomorrows, and apparently they fear having their money in the stock market when there's about to be a new president of the United States.