Search This Blog


Saturday, October 10, 2015

The right of self-defense shall not be infringed

I got this topic today from my brother, Michael. Thanks bro.

Obama's been stumping recently for more gun control, or perhaps a better term than gun control is gun confiscation. Liberals believe that if there are less guns then logically there will be less violence, less crime, less murder, less suicide. In liberal parlance, less guns means more peace. Are they right? It turns out that, actually, you don't have to guess! That's right! There was a time not too long ago in geological terms when there were no guns. Nope! It was peace and tranquility. It was lions laying down with lambs. It was THE DARK AGES YOU MORONIC DUNCE!... okay okay calming down now. I was channeling my inner Sam Kinison. And maybe that's why liberals hate guns. What if you're crazy? Who wants a lunatic crooning lullabies to his arsenal?

Did our forefathers put the right of self-defense in the Constitution? Here's the 2nd amendment.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Liberals AKA Democrats AKA progressives AKA Barack Hussein Obama will argue that of all the people owning guns, very few indeed are part of any kind of "regulated Militia." They will also argue that in those times, "Arms" were black powder muskets, taking quite some time to load and shoot a single ball of lead. Nobody expected improvements in armaments. The musket was the most deadly thing on earth at the time. Our benighted founding fathers lacking any grounding at all in history were probably completely unaware that Arms got better and better as the years passed.

After all, for thousands of years people used rocks and sticks as "Arms", and for more hundreds of years they used bronze knives and later iron swords, and then even later for more hundreds of years it was armor and horses and lances and bows and cannons and trebuchet, and finally to top it all off it was finally muskets. Yes muskets. These modern day weapons represented the acme of technology. After pouring in the powder and ramming it down you put in your pellet of lead and touched it off with a match or something. Honestly, since the notion of "Arms" had never in the entire history of the world ever gotten more deadly, how, I ask you, HOW could our founding fathers have EVER expected anything perhaps even more deadly than a musket?

[By the way, the entire preceding paragraph was shrieked Sam-Kinison-style in an ever-louder ever shriller and ever more sarcastic tone. AH AHHH AHHHHHHHH!!!!]

We mustn't forget that part about a "well regulated Militia." Let's parse that phrase, shall we? If you read the statement logically, it says that because X is true, then Y is the law of the land. WHAT WHAT WHAT?! You say that X is false? It doesn't matter. You'll notice that the 2nd Amendment doesn't say While X continues to be true then Y is the law of the land. The founding fathers simply gave a reason for declaring that Y is the law of the land. They did not limit the right to bear arms, exactly the opposite was the case. They said ... "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!"

I would argue that since that constitution was ratified by the United States, the right to bear Arms has been infringed upon again and again and again. Recently Ben Carson has come under fire. He argued that if the seven million Jews in Nazi Germany had owned guns, history might have turned out differently. Alright Ben, I just going to come out and say it... THAT'S THE FACT, JACK!

And so now, we get down to brass tacks. Is it okay for you to defend yourself from an aggressor? Let's take a look at bullfighting for the answer. The bull is probably going to lose, but just to be sure, do they cut off its horns? That's stupid! If somebody attacks you, you have the right to defend yourself.

You want to know what it was like before a man could load a pistol and confront his attacker on equal terms? Your forefather was most likely a peasant. He lived a life of starvation and hardship. Ninety percent of his crop was confiscated at sword point for his entire life. He faced an armored man wielding a sword and shield. Every knobby bone in his body stood out as he shivered in the cold. He didn't stand a chance.

If that sounds like world peace to you ... then you're too stupid to continue living, so do us all a favor, and shuffle off, already.

Sunday, October 4, 2015

Can't Touch This.

KABUL — The acting governor of Afghanistan's northern Kunduz province said Sunday that Taliban fighters had been routinely firing "small and heavy" weapons from the ground of a local hospital before it was apparently hit by a U.S. airstrike over the weekend. (snip...)
Schools, hospitals, and mosques, are considered "safe ground" by the enemy. They set up mortars and rocket launchers on "safe ground" so that when—inevitably—they are hit by counter-fire, they can immediately run to the main-stream media and scream in hysterical anguish and woe that the Great Satan has again crossed that fantastically ephemeral line between socially acceptably war, and the darkly evil genocide that all Muslims know is being perpetrated against all Muslims everywhere.

When you think of America, those four diabolical syllables should—if you've been properly programmed by your neighborhood leftwing public school—conjure thoughts of barbarity, carnage, fangs dripping blood, the routine flogging of slaves carrying burdens too heavy for any man to carry, soldiers firing their M-16s into screaming crowds of fleeing school children, rape, pillage, and horror unimaginable.
In an interview, Hamdullah Danishi said the Doctors Without Borders compound was “a Taliban base” that was being used to plot and carry out attacks across the provincial capital, Kunduz city.

“The hospital campus was 100 percent used by the Taliban,” Danishi said. “The hospital has a vast garden, and the Taliban were there. We tolerated their firing for some time” before responding.
<snark>Gosh! It seems to me that Doctors Without Borders is a really SUPER idea!</snark> They're doctors who don't care about politics; they just want to save lives. Yet...they continued doing their work knowing ... KNOWING!!! ... that rockets were being launched from their hospital "safe ground" and that these rockets were most likely killing people. Tens of people, hundreds of people, who knows how many people? What if rockets were being launched from the roof of the grounds where you worked? If your job was saving lives then I have a simple question Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), would you save more lives by running your hospital / "safe ground" or just packing up and going home? I ask this question most sincerely because it's a question you well-meaning—yet misguided—assholes have apparently never asked of yourselves.

Friday, September 25, 2015

I'm taking Redstate out of my blog roll.

In fairness, Trump is not the only GOP candidate to have facilitated this deliberate and malicious replacement of Americans with foreign workers who are more easily underpaid, threatened and dominated. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) favors tripling the number of H1B-Visa applicants to replace scientific and technical workers such as IT Technicians at US companies. It was a senatorial aide to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) who most openly explained what these visa programs really existed to accomplish. There are no legitimate protectors of the American republic on the issue of immigration.
There won't be any GOPe failtheater here.
The site is a subsidiary of Salem Communications. Erick Erickson is the Chairman of the Board and Editor-in-Chief of RedState.[2] At the time of the purchase, Eagle Publishing agreed to let RedState maintain its editorial constructs as a collaborative blog. The site's editor-in-chief, Erick Erickson, was a political contributor on CNN from 2010 to 2013; he joined Fox News as a political contributor in 2013.[4]

Thursday, September 24, 2015

[They] are turning the world into homos! Here's why.

As I was walking through the grocery store today I turned down the Deodorant/shampoo aisle. I turned to my brother and pointed out the cheapest shampoo. (Suave) A 32 ounce bottle costs $1.59. I said, "You see that bottle of shampoo? You can wash your hair with that, but you can also use it as body soap. There was a day when they didn't have "Shampoo," they just had soap. Then what happened, is that some genius figured out that if you make a soap specifically for hair, you can sell twice as much soap." My brother was doubtful. "How do you know that's what happened?" "Because I know people. I know scams, and I know how scammers work."

Suddenly I realized I was onto something. I looked towards the other side of the aisle and what do you know, there it was! On one side was men's deodorant and shampoo, and on the other side of the aisle was women's deodorant and shampoo. So I said to my brother: "Look over here. You see this? There was a day when they didn't have one kind of soap for men and a different soap for women. It was just soap. They figured out how to sell four different kinds of soap for hair and body and men and women, two different kinds of deodorant, also."

"You know what?" I said, "something just occurred to me. The makeup industry that convinced women that they should slather their faces with all that plaster and paint is certainly quite the racket. One paint for the eyelid, one paint for the lips, one paint for the eyelashes, another for the cheeks, a pencil for the edge of the eyelid. More paint for the fingernails and probably a different paint for the toes."

"Do you see the problem?" I asked. "It's a waste of money?" I shook my head sadly at his lack of imagination. "Look, the cosmetics industry is a HUGE. But they're only getting half the market. What if they could get men to wear makeup? Then they could sell twice as much!" So there it is. You want to know why the big push to turn everybody gay? So they can sell more makeup.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

What's Happening?

It's just never enough, is it? It is tragically Sisyphean in point of fact. The never-resolved tragic situation seems to be America's calling card. We go just so far, but never quite far enough to finish. World War II was the last time that we actually finished something that we started. Vietnam, Korea, the never-ending wars in the Mideast represent a roiling stew of humanity that can't ever quite make up its mind about what it is that we want. The war on poverty. The war on drugs. The war on wars. What a joke! It's all so impossibly stupid and pointless that as I write these words I'm left shivering with fury.

The road to Obamacare required a super-majority in the Senate, and a President who'd sign on the dotted line. It's a fascinating story of bad-luck and fate, that you might be interested in discovering. Today many of us have lost our health insurance. Many more of us have discovered that in-spite of doubled insurance premiums, our coverage has almost vanished.

Planned Parenthood. What a joke! Why not just call it what it is? They should rename this diabolical unholy flock of baby slaughterers. Why not call it: "Oh Shit!" As they carve up your "donation" and sell it piece by piece for a tidy profit, you might want to ask yourself what does it cost?

I had an argument last night with my atheist brother. He couldn't stop arguing the bible with me. I'd say something like: "How did the Big-Bang happen?" and he'd respond with a non-sequitur about a "magic man in the sky." "Where did the first one-celled organism come from?" "Well it certainly didn't come because the magic man in the sky said 'abracadabra'." "Just explain where the first one-celled organism came from!" "I don't have to. Everything you say is stupid. You're stupid. It's too bad you believe in ghosts vampires, werewolves and magic men who live in never-never land."

"You don't have to?!!! WTF! You don't have to have an explanation for how life happened? You claim to have all he answers and you claim that science itself is on your side but you refuse! You REFUSE! to even entertain the idea that your own hypothesis of life omits ... leaves out ... doesn't mention ... ignores ... fails to recognize that life is so impossibly complex that it CANNOT! happen by accident.

All atheists have on this topic is the 'BELIEF' that life just suddenly and mysteriously appeared as though by some strange and mysterious sort of alchemy or something. BOOM! LIFE! Hurrah!? That's not an argument that's insanity! You haven't gone far enough. You've stopped at 'I don't have to know how it happened.' What happened to: 'then what?'"

Oh but I've gone off topic. Appy polly loggies. The world is on the verge of eating its own tongue—perhaps with a serving of fava beans and a nice chianti—but lets ignore all of that and unilaterally decree that GAY MARRIAGE IS THE LAW OF THE LAND! Iran with nuclear missiles is the law of the land. Common core and failure is the law of the land. NASA is about making Muslims feel good about their own dischievements.
Charles Bolden, a retired United States Marines Corps major-general and former astronaut, said in an interview with al-Jazeera that Nasa was not only a space exploration agency but also an "Earth improvement agency".

Mr Bolden said: "When I became the Nasa administrator, he [Mr Obama] charged me with three things.

"One, he wanted me to help reinspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math, and engineering."
If you fell asleep 40 years ago and woke up this morning, I would expect you to ask this question:

Friday, September 18, 2015

Donald Trump Agrees Obama is Muslim and Foreign Born

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you. How outrageous! When Trump was confronted with an ethical dilemma of Grimace Proportions, he actually agreed with the villain! It was as if a man had just bitch-slapped a woman and everybody who witnessed this obamanation instead of being disgusted and outraged, was instead thrilled about it!


While this was mildy entertaining—in a vaguely misogynistic way—it serves to illustrate a point. We simply do not expect large men to just suddenly bitch-slap a smaller woman, even if the woman clearly deserves it. I know what you're thinking. No woman deserves this. It's not right! A man should just take one in the ball-sack and shrug it off, am I right? Okay, but that's not the point I'm making here. The point is that when a Trump fan asked a question of Trump by prefacing the question with a disquisition regarding Obama and his Muslim faith, his foreign birth, and his fake birth certificate, Trump simply ignored it, perhaps even agreed with it. That's right, he didn't immediately verbally bitch-slap the impudent and manifestly politically incorrect supporter, instead he said "right."

Can you believe the nerve of Trump? After the deranged unhinged rant which despicably questioned the authenticity of our dear leader, Trump not only didn't correct the man, but instead actually seemed to agree with him, by saying: "right." Now then, you can ask about it and they'll tell you the idea that Obama's birth certificate is a forgery is simply an urban myth. Here's the findings of a six-month long investigation by a group of professional investigators in Arizona who can spot a forgery from a mile away:

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Ahmed Mohamed and his ominous clock

The New York Times wants you to be as outraged as they are at the treatment that this young teen received from school authorities and police in Irving Texas. How shameful and unjust—some would say—to arrest a young teen for simply engaging in the American dream, engaging in the learning process and innocently building a digital clock. In a metal box. With metal wire wrapped around it. And—by the way—how bigoted and racist for any of us to even consider the fact that his name happens to be Ahmed Mohamed.

Taqiyya is a time honored Muslim tradition. In contrast to the tenets of Christianity, deceit, dissembling, and bald-face lying are all tacitly accepted and even encouraged when it promotes the advancement of Sharia or the increase of Mohammed followers.

So, who're you going to believe? Ahmed Mohamed or your lying eyes? It looks like a bomb and his name is Ahmed Mohamad. What a perfect foil Ahmed presents to us. He's just a wrongly accused innocent kid. He's not a terrorist, and shame on you for thinking he might me. Now we've learned the error of our ways. Now we can let our bigotry and racist stereotyping finally fall by the wayside, and embrace the 10,000 Syrians that are on their way. But don't worry, only 200 of them are likely to be terrorists.

It's at this point that I thought it would interest you to know that the catastrophic terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, was the result of only 19 terrorists. If 19 jihadis could cost us two trillion dollars, doing some simple math—okay this math wasn't quite so simple after all—I get over one-hundred five billion per terrorist. That works out to 105,263,157,894.00 x 200 = twenty-one trillion dollars of possible damage these poor refugees could potentially inflict upon America under cover of taqiyya and our politically correct thought police...AKA NYT.

Did I mention the precocious fourteen-year-old Muslim named Ahmed Mohamed who already knows how to build digital clocks from scratch?

UPDATE 09/17/2015 12:55 PM CST

Ahmed's device does look suspicious. I didn't have a picture of it yesterday, but here it is: